A multimodal model for general Q&A, coding, and tool calling. FP8 weights run across two nodes connected directly by DAC, validating distributed inference and long context.
Multimodal understandingText, images, video → text
2 MegaCubesTest report available
01 / Model parameters
Model architecture & capabilities
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is a multimodal mixture-of-experts model for general Q&A and agent tasks. It uses sparse experts, hybrid attention, and embedding components that support tiered loading, drawing on a subset of compute resources at each step. Total parameters, active parameters per step, and actual device memory use are distinct measures.
Long-document Q&A and information extraction
Code writing and project updates
Multi-step tool workflows
Publisher / base model
Alibaba Qwen · Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Parameter breakdown
125B language model / 6B active; an additional 51B N-gram embedding and 4B MTP component
Architecture
48-layer MoE; 512 routed experts, 10 selected per step, plus 1 shared expert; Gated DeltaNet + QSA
Model context
Native 262,144 tokens, expandable to 1M; configured limits and tested lengths listed separately
Input / output
Text, image, and video input; text and tool-call output
Key capabilities
Q&A, complex reasoning, coding, tool calling, and multimodal understanding
Weights used here
Qwen official FP8 version; 131 safetensors shards
License
Qwen Community License 1.0
Tests on this setup primarily cover text and long context. The two-device FP8 and single-device NVFP4 setups differ in precision and loading method, so their relative speed cannot be inferred from device count alone.
2026-08-28; two devices directly linked by DAC; 752 performance matrix requests. The table lists fixed input/output lengths and concurrency levels; throughput is aggregated across concurrent requests.
112.98 tok/s512/128 tokens · C8 aggregate output
0.421 s512/128 tokens · C1 TTFT P95
262,144261,888 input + 256 output passed
Fixed-token performance matrix
Input / output
Concurrency
RPS
Aggregate output throughput (tok/s)
TTFT P50 / P95
TPOT P50 / P95
Success rate
512 / 128
C1
0.2530
32.38
0.405 / 0.421 s
27.51 / 31.14 ms
100%
512 / 128
C2
0.4204
53.82
0.476 / 0.731 s
32.63 / 38.93 ms
100%
512 / 128
C4
0.6065
77.63
0.529 / 0.818 s
46.68 / 52.97 ms
100%
512 / 128
C8
0.8827
112.98
0.642 / 1.868 s
63.62 / 75.74 ms
100%
2048 / 256
C1
0.1274
32.62
0.895 / 1.129 s
26.51 / 29.14 ms
100%
2048 / 256
C2
0.2046
52.37
0.986 / 1.698 s
33.51 / 36.71 ms
100%
2048 / 256
C4
0.2881
73.76
1.659 / 2.816 s
46.96 / 54.56 ms
100%
2048 / 256
C8
0.4005
102.54
1.806 / 5.338 s
67.72 / 79.93 ms
100%
8128 / 1024
C1
0.0362
37.10
0.892 / 0.903 s
26.10 / 26.80 ms
100%
8128 / 1024
C2
0.0582
59.65
1.006 / 2.978 s
30.93 / 34.68 ms
100%
8128 / 1024
C4
0.0814
83.37
2.910 / 6.109 s
44.40 / 49.68 ms
100%
8128 / 1024
C8
0.1099
112.57
3.235 / 5.503 s
67.94 / 81.24 ms
100%
16,384 / 1024
C1
0.0329
33.72
2.709 / 3.205 s
26.66 / 28.04 ms
100%
16,384 / 1024
C2
0.0600
61.43
1.137 / 1.803 s
30.73 / 33.47 ms
100%
16,384 / 1024
C4
0.0732
74.92
3.526 / 12.546 s
46.00 / 57.95 ms
100%
16,384 / 1024
C8
0.0905
92.63
7.968 / 23.050 s
70.51 / 100.68 ms
100%
32,768 / 1024
C1
0.0318
32.57
3.550 / 3.557 s
27.08 / 28.34 ms
100%
32,768 / 1024
C2
0.0537
54.97
5.647 / 6.802 s
30.88 / 32.63 ms
100%
32,768 / 1024
C4
0.0603
61.77
8.084 / 19.460 s
50.84 / 67.58 ms
100%
32,768 / 1024
C8
0.0743
76.11
21.725 / 73.848 s
61.27 / 117.96 ms
100%
Use C1 for full-length 262K requests. Short-input C8 results do not establish concurrency at the full context length.
The single-device NVFP4 setup and this two-device FP8 setup use different precision and deployment methods; interpret their results separately.
C1 / C4 / C8 denotes 1 / 4 / 8 concurrent requests. TTFT (time to first token) measures elapsed time from submitting a request to receiving its first output token. TPOT (time per output token) measures average time per generated token after the first token. Aggregate throughput is the combined output rate across concurrent requests; a single-request token generation rate is measured separately in tok/s.
Public benchmark references
Model capability & platform performance benchmarks
The following results are published by model developers or platform providers and are separate from the MegaCube tests above. Capability scores measure task performance; tok/s measures token throughput. Results obtained with different models, numerical precision, hardware, or test protocols are not directly comparable.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next official capability reference
Qwen · Checked on 2026-09-20
Evaluated model
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next base model; not a retest of the two-device configuration on this page
Test platform
Inference hardware not disclosed by the source
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next official capability reference · Data
Benchmark
Score
What it measures
GPQA Diamond
91.7
Challenging science Q&A
SWE-bench Pro
62.5
Software engineering problem solving
DeepSWE v1.1
58.7
Software problem solving
Test conditionsCoding benchmarks use temperature=1, top_p=0.95, and 256K context. SWE-bench Pro uses Claude Code and the corrected task set; DeepSWE reports the best result across Claude Code and mini-SWE frameworks.